25

Apr

World Week for Animals in Labs

As World Week for Animals in Labs draws to a close, I’m a little ashamed to say I have a bias towards today’s animal – the monkey. When I look at their faces, all I see is a small human being; so full of character and emotion. Monkeys are intelligent, sociable and have complex needs but in 2006 more than 3,000 monkeys were used in experiments in Britain.

More than 10,000 are used across the European Union each year. Imprisoning these animals in labs causes them to suffer even before any experiments are conducted. Experiments conducted on monkeys include deliberately brain-damaging them, infecting them with diseases and testing vaccines on them, which can cause severe pain and paralysis.

Monkeys are genetically close to humans, but the Northwick Park “elephant man” drug trial showed how important the differences between us can be. The “elephant man” drug was tested on rats and monkeys, but only in humans did it prove to be deadly. Many other animal tests produce results that just don’t apply to humans. In just a few examples, saccharin causes tumours in rats but not humans, aspirin causes birth defects in dogs but not humans, and monkeys infected with HIV don’t develop AIDS.

The European Union is due to introduce a new law within the next few months to regulate animal experiments. PETA will be pressing British and European politicians for the strongest animal protection measures possible – including a ban on all tests on monkeys. to the growing list of people who have written to support a ban on primate tests and the introduction of the toughest possible rules under the new law.


Tags: ,


3 users responded in this post

Subscribe to this post comment rss
posted by Amy summers on April 26th, 2008 at 3:37 pm

Just want to say a big Thank-you to PETA & all the other Animal lovers out there….Animals are sacred & deserve to be treated with respect…
Its shocking how evil & in humane some people are..
Why test on innocent Animals. Instead of putting really evil people in jail that have done something really bad like hurt children etc..why not test on human people like that eh??? leave the innocent Animals out of it..Also im totaly discusted & devastated over bloody fur farms, wen i saw the video i cried for days its pure evil & in human…
If someone murders a human being thats murder, well sorry but to me murder is murder, whether its killing a human or an Animal…
Just so Thankful that theres PETA and others that care…We need to protect & continue to do all that we possibly can till we make this world a better place for Animals…
luv & peace to you all
Amy x

posted by tracey passmore on April 27th, 2008 at 10:50 am

hi we should be testing on murders and rapeist and child malesters but that would be wrong in others eyes.. not on theres poor little animals

posted by SB on April 29th, 2008 at 10:40 am

PETA, Thank you so much. You are such an inspiration to me and lots of other people.

Animals are, basically a reflection of us. Testing on animals is wrong, unnessisary and unaccurate. Like PETA said, why use animals? Think how you’d feel? Locked up in a cage, going mental because of it and then having something AWFUL injected inside you. You will NEVER EVER get accurate results if you test on animals. EVER. So theres no point ! PETA are doing such a good job, and so are all you animal lovers! Keep it up !

Remember: Bunnys, cats and dogs were NOT made to wear mascarra.

SB x

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated and any obnoxious or promotional comments may be removed. If your comment is excessively inappropriate, or if you question why a comment was removed, you may be banned.

 Name (*required)

 E-Mail Address (*private)

 Web Site (*optional)

Meet Alexia Bookmark This Blog
  • Friends
  • Disclaimer
  • The information and views expressed here are those of the author alone, are subject to change and may not represent the views of PETA. They are provided here for educational purposes only and have been gathered from the author's personal research and experiences. They should not be construed as legal advice. Except where third party ownership or copyright is indicated or credited regarding materials contained in this blog, copying, reproducing or redistributing any of the documents, data, content or materials contained in this Weblog for personal, non-commercial use is enthusiastically encouraged.