18

Jun

Why Anna Wintour Doesn’t Deserve an OBE

posted at 6:50 PM
Permalink
Comments (3)

So Anna Wintour, the fur-hag editor-in-chief of American Vogue is getting an OBE, huh? Apparently, she has been awarded in the Queen’s birthday list for her ‘service’ to British journalism and British fashion in the US.

Here’s why this decision is a bad one:

Anna Wintour is responsible for the unashamed flaunting of fur between the covers of Vogue. She must therefore share responsibility for the deaths of thousands of animals that are trapped, drowned or beaten to death in the wild, and gassed, strangled or electrocuted on fur farms. She has no excuse – PETA US has shown her footage of animals suffering for this so-called ‘fashion’, yet the pro-fur editorial continues.

Order of the British Empire? More like Order of the Bloody E… actually, you got me there. Comments welcome!

VogueSucks.com has more.

Image: StyleBlogs / CC

Tags: Anna Wintour, fur, Queen, Vogue

Post this story to:
StumbleUpon
Digg
Newsvine
del.icio.us
Hugg

3 users responded in this post

Subscribe to this post comment rss

posted by Matt on June 18th, 2008 at 7:35 pm

Old B**ch Evilness!
One Braincell Exercised
Openly Boring Everyone!

posted by Pan on June 19th, 2008 at 10:19 am

yup she doesn’t deserve one not only because she kills animal but because she is f***ing b**ch and realy ugly

posted by tandy on June 24th, 2008 at 1:27 pm

yes what an old looking hag she is. She deserves to be skinned alive and electrocuted like those innocent creatures.

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated and any obnoxious or promotional comments may be removed. If your comment is excessively inappropriate, or if you question why a comment was removed, you may be banned.

Meet Alexia

Bookmark This Blog

Friends

Disclaimer
The information and views expressed here are those of the author alone, are subject to change and may not represent the views of PETA. They are provided here for educational purposes only and have been gathered from the author's personal research and experiences. They should not be construed as legal advice. Except where third party ownership or copyright is indicated or credited regarding materials contained in this blog, copying, reproducing or redistributing any of the documents, data, content or materials contained in this Weblog for personal, non-commercial use is enthusiastically encouraged.