9

Jul

Tony Blair Needs to Choose: Meat or the Environment


Seems to me political figures these days just don’t know what’s best for the environment (or themselves and their public image for that matter). First Gordon Brown, and now another figure who’s popped up in the media for his ‘championing’ of environment issues, is ex-Prime Minister Tony Blair. Yes, he’s still around, but there’s a slight problem with what he’s garbling on about. In a Q&A session with The Independent readers, he admits that eating meat produces four times as many greenhouse gas emissions as the airline industry (and about forty percent more than all cars, lorries, and other forms of transport combined), but seems too addicted to his chicken dinners to be able to see reality.

Anyway, it went a little something like this:

Blair: “This is why I have called for G8 leaders to support efforts to reduce forest destruction and degradation … Minimising emissions from agricultural sources will be an important part of efforts to limit climate change.

Reader: “Will you (therefore) go vegetarian and lead by example?”

Blair replied: “This does not mean the world has to give up meat.”

Oh. Come. On! Tony, we know you can do better than that, all you need is a bit of guidance.

So we sent him a letter today asking him to go vegetarian. Among other things, it said:

“Combating deforestation is a fine goal, but unless we tackle the root of the problem – which isn’t razing trees but raising billions of animals for food – we won’t make a dent in this serious and deadly problem. Won’t you please consider adopting a vegetarian diet and promoting it as the most effective thing anyone can do to fight against global warming?”

Image: Guardian / CC


Tags: , ,


14 users responded in this post

Subscribe to this post comment rss
posted by Karen on July 10th, 2008 at 5:06 am

Ilove the disclaimer at the “comment” site. It truly shows real cowardness. My comment: These people (PETA)need to be subjected to the kind of poverty, abuse and terror that the children of Africa and other countries live through every single day. If any human being can research the evidence, look at pictures of children suffering with these abomidal conditions, then look at pictures of animals possably being abused, if they can then say, we need to focus our attention and dedication to the animals, rather than the children, then I feel their very humanity needs to be questioned and scrutinized. May God help us all if this is how we as a society, choose to put animals rights over those of innocent children, we and our plantet are surely doomed.

posted by Dan on July 10th, 2008 at 11:31 am

I support Animal Rights and Human Rights.
I fight against ALL suffering. It’s all wrong, no one is more important than the other.
Do your research, animal liberation and human liberation are all connected. Injustice ANYWHERE is a threat to justice everywhere. Dumbass. :)

posted by Dan on July 10th, 2008 at 11:34 am

I wonder if PETA has realized that it’s biggest opposition is religion.
The anti-PETA comments often have the word God in there somewhere.

Says a lot about Atheist Morals vs. Christian ‘amazing wonderful perfect morals’!!

posted by Alexia on July 10th, 2008 at 2:43 pm

Karen,

You may like to read this http://www.goveg.com/worldhunger.asp - I think you’ll change your mind! :)

posted by keith on July 10th, 2008 at 4:09 pm

Nice one ” Dan,” keep em coming !

posted by Niranjan on July 11th, 2008 at 12:40 pm

When it comes to pain and suffering we are all the same. If you really care for those African children, Go veg! Because if u eat meat, ur stealing their food! So PETA is turning ppl into veggies so that those africans can have some decent food which is wasted on animals.

Torturing animals and helpin African Children is NO way related. We need to make this world a better place for ALL being.

“The greatness of a nation & it’s moral progress can be judged by the way animals are treated” - M.K Gandhi.

posted by Vadim on July 11th, 2008 at 5:44 pm

I think cutting down on meat consumption is a good start, although going vegetarian on a global level would probably be preferable for the environment.

I want to see something like what Paul McCartney proposed: meat-free Mondays. Everyone should have an incentive to be vegetarian at least one day a week. And this was directed at the British people specifically so I’d like to see someone like Blair or Brown encourage people to cut meat from their diet at least once a week (and do it themselves).

Anyways I started a bit of a campaign to try and get it started: https://www.thepoint.com/campaigns/meatless-mc-cartney-mondays/

My hope is with more people doing a gradual reduction in their consumption rates this can become mainstream and one day become a staple in the American (and British) diet.

posted by Luke on July 15th, 2008 at 5:27 am

What a load of tosh*. I have no religious or spiritual belief’s whatsoever. I believe in logic and reason.

I find it disturbing that PETA members and people of a like mind, can compare human suffering to that of an animal. Now I’m sure that reason and clarity must come easy from an organisation, that seems to agree with such notable figures as Hitler**. But surely the fact that a majority of Anthropologists and Sociologists have been so bold as to suggest that the consumption of meat has been beneficial to both the evolution of mankind in general and the survival of certain peoples.

Without meat, there would be no humanity as we know it. Ergo, you wouldn’t care about animal welfare, because you’d be up a tree, unable to even think of such concepts as animal welfare or anything less base.

Vegetarianism, is a by-product of post Protestant society in the west. The idea’s of self denial and ‘meat envy’ come to mind at a vegetarian house party serving ‘Linda McCartney” sausages.

What I’m trying to say is human life is more important than that of animals, and only in the US and UK do we find it necessary to personify animals and bring them up to our level.

- L.A.F

*I could have come up with a stronger adjective.
**Any one remember the “animal slaughter is worse than the Holocaust” campaign?

posted by Michael on July 30th, 2008 at 2:45 pm

“Now I’m sure that reason and clarity must come easy from an organization, that seems to agree with such notable figures as Hitler**”

Now could you explain to everybody here, how PETA agrees with Hitler, because your statement did not really seem to make sense. If PETA compared animal slaughter worse than the Holcaust, only by supporting animal slaughter would we be agreeing with Hitler.

Also, not all vegetarians would claim that not eating meat is natural in evolutionary terms, however I would say in the era in which we live now, it would be beneficial to the majority if vegetarianism were to become more mainstream.

Michael

posted by Renewoods on July 30th, 2008 at 5:20 pm

Over the years I have noted that people who actively support Human Rights do not critisize people or organisations that work towards Animal Rights. True compassion has no barriers, Ghandi taught us that!

posted by Gerda F on July 30th, 2008 at 5:45 pm

On http://www.futurefood.org/globalbenefits/index_en.php and the subpages you find a huge list of studies and facts how meat-consumption harms animals, the environment, world-nutrition and human health. It’s a pity Tony Blair will probably never check out this page, and the solutions offered there.

posted by Barry Thorogood on July 31st, 2008 at 5:35 pm

It is not essential for human beings to eat animals to survive. Therefore the only reason people eat them is because they like the taste. How arrogant for the human species, who apparently are blessed with consciousness, to think that they have the right to destroy the sanctity of life, to satisfy their taste buds! At the same time we continue to destroy our only means of life support, Planet Earth. What a strange, stupid and dangerous species we are. Those who eat meat and defend it should join those who smoke cigarettes and defend smoking, those who drink copious amounts of alcohol and become violent, and those who take drugs for ‘pleasure’ and defend their right to do so. With freedom comes responsibility. These groups are a retrograde step in the evolution of the human species and are prepared to harm others to defend their pathetic behaviour. Get a life!

posted by Mary Mitchell on August 2nd, 2008 at 7:29 pm

” Without meat there would be no humanity”!! I would have to look hard to find a more idiotic ( not to mention downright ignorant ) statement! Eating meat has been largely a cultural and social development in the history of homo sapiens and in fact has not developed in all societies. Secondly, never in the history of mankind have we consumed so much non-human animal flesh as have the citizens of developed countries in the last 50 to 100 years. This has had an enormous impact( hugely detrimental as every enlightened scientist will tell you) on our health as well as the environment. I would strongly suggest that L.A.F. follow the link to the website mentioned above for Karen.

posted by NusSahharry on August 2nd, 2008 at 10:41 pm

Brilliant!

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated and any obnoxious or promotional comments may be removed. If your comment is excessively inappropriate, or if you question why a comment was removed, you may be banned.

 Name (*required)

 E-Mail Address (*private)

 Web Site (*optional)

Meet Alexia Bookmark This Blog
  • Friends
  • Disclaimer
  • The information and views expressed here are those of the author alone, are subject to change and may not represent the views of PETA. They are provided here for educational purposes only and have been gathered from the author's personal research and experiences. They should not be construed as legal advice. Except where third party ownership or copyright is indicated or credited regarding materials contained in this blog, copying, reproducing or redistributing any of the documents, data, content or materials contained in this Weblog for personal, non-commercial use is enthusiastically encouraged.