21

Apr

The Race Is On to Create In Vitro Meat

I’m not sure what you’re all going to think about this, but it should create some debate… Ok, PETA US is offering $1 million (over £500,000) to the first person to come up with a method of producing commercially viable quantities of in vitro meat. I can see a rift already beginning to develop here – you have your hardcore vegans on one side trying to stop themselves throwing up at the thought of eating meat again, and then your meat-eaters who wish there was a kinder way to eat animals. My thoughts? Well, if there’s a way of stopping the slaughter of billions and billions of animals every year for their flesh and this is the way to do it…

To qualify for the prize, the quantity of meat produced by the scientist must be sufficient to market in at least ten US states at a price that is competitive with chicken prices. Switching to lab-grown meat would be a boon to the environment, as a recent UN study concluded that raising animals for food generates more greenhouse-gas emissions than all the cars, trucks and planes in the world combined and is a top contributor to land degradation and water pollution. In vitro meat, or a vegetarian diet, would help solve these worldwide problems.

In the Guardian today, Ed Pilkington talked about cloned meat but this really is not going to help either the environment, the starving poor or, of course, animals destined for the slaughterhouse. Cloned meat is no different from ‘regular’ meat, so that plan can be dropped right away.

Oh, and this isn’t an April Fools prank – I promise. If you’re a scientist and think you have the answer, go ahead and enter the contest. There’s $1 million in it for you. So, would you eat in vitro meat?


Tags: ,


5 users responded in this post

Subscribe to this post comment rss
posted by Perry de Havilland on April 21st, 2008 at 3:03 pm

“So, would you eat in vitro meat?”

If it was better (or as good as plus cheaper) then sure, why not? Personally I have no ethical problem whatsoever with eating animals any more than I have an ethical problem with a shark eating me (we all have our place in the food chain so it is simply not an ethical issue in my view), but I do not see anything ‘wrong’ with the idea of ‘in vitro meat’.

posted by Hilke on April 21st, 2008 at 3:05 pm

CAN YOU GROW MEAT WITHOUT IT HAVING PAIN??? i WOULDN’T EAT IT ANYWAY, IS THAT MEAT WITHOUT A HEAD OR HEART OR NERVES???, DOESN’T THAT TAKE STUDYING AGAIN LAB ANIMALS, IF SO, WHAT IS THE POINT.

posted by Niranjan on April 22nd, 2008 at 12:06 am

I think we can produce meat without pain, this will be cultured in a nutrient medium (plant based, hopefully!) Just one cell or a tissue must be extracted from the animal (chicken, fish or cow) & out of this billions of tissues/flesh can be produced. I have worked like this on plants, this is what you call ‘Plant Tissue Culture’, i’m not sure about animals . . . But definitely we can do it, it will take some time & research. . .

posted by Rusty on April 22nd, 2008 at 3:40 am

Firstly, just to be pedantic, the meat would be grown in petri dishes and then culture flasks rather than test tubes ;) this idea has been around since the late nineties, and in fact since 2002 some scientists have been growing in vitro meat. one problem would be the massive cost of doing this versus the cost of current sources of meat.

to niranjan, nice try at winning the prize, but any science directed at plant culture systems will not apply to tissue culture systems. you couldn’t have a plant-based medium as it would not contain the necessary growth factors required to create cells. you would need a growth medium derived/containing fetal calf serum for example. you would need to use animals in at least one stage of the culture process for this reason. and yes, you might expect “billions of tissues/flesh” (don’t get me started on inaccurate science here) but you would have to develop them in the same way as animal muscle for them to be a competitor to in vivo meat (think about texture etc..) and that is very difficult. if it weren’t then you would expect people to be walking around with artificial muscles already!

and then on to taste, the big one for me and the rest of the meat fans out there. i don’t think it is going to be comparable to the variety of meat out there. flavour that is brought about my exercise, enzyme secretion, healthiness, diet etc.. i imagine in vitro meat would be rather bland and tasteless without these factors. at the end of the day i would rather eat ethically farmed and reared animals than in vitro meat that would possibly require additives to flavour it up.

posted by Celia Clarke on April 23rd, 2008 at 5:17 am

I think this is a good idea, but as it might take years and years before it could be marketed, could we not, in the meantime, to pacify the meat-eaters, try a lot harder to give animals reared for food a much better life and a COMPLETELY PAIN AND TERROR-FREE DEATH? How hard can it be? Why isn’t more being done? Why do we have to rely on PETA all the time, why can’t GOVERNMENTS DO something? Why can’t we make sure we only vote for MPs who will DO something?

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated and any obnoxious or promotional comments may be removed. If your comment is excessively inappropriate, or if you question why a comment was removed, you may be banned.

 Name (*required)

 E-Mail Address (*private)

 Web Site (*optional)

Meet Alexia Bookmark This Blog
  • Friends
  • Disclaimer
  • The information and views expressed here are those of the author alone, are subject to change and may not represent the views of PETA. They are provided here for educational purposes only and have been gathered from the author's personal research and experiences. They should not be construed as legal advice. Except where third party ownership or copyright is indicated or credited regarding materials contained in this blog, copying, reproducing or redistributing any of the documents, data, content or materials contained in this Weblog for personal, non-commercial use is enthusiastically encouraged.