11

Apr

Don’t Kill Badgers in Wales, Go Veg Instead

After hearing that a badger cull is to take place in Wales, supposedly to stop the spread of TB in cattle, we fired off a letter written by our chief Ingrid Newkirk to Elin Jones, Rural Affairs Minister. Wildlife culls are a major bug-bear of mine, they are morally and scientifically outrageous, especially when done to solve human problems. This is what Ingrid said:

“Badgers are intelligent animals who live in families of four to 12. These gentle native animals are British icons and are much loved by the public. Badgers dig underground nesting chambers (setts), some of which have been used for more than 100 years by many generations of badgers.

Your plan to kill badgers to supposedly stop the spread of tuberculosis in cattle is a cruel and misguided attempt to place the blame for TB in cattle somewhere other than where it belongs –with the meat and dairy industries. These industries’ own practices – including intensively confining cattle to dark, filthy, poorly ventilated buildings and transporting cattle without testing them for TB – are catalysts for spreading TB and other diseases.

Instead of your intended badger cull, we suggest that you recommend to the people of Wales that they adopt a vegetarian diet. By doing so, they will save the friendly badger by eliminating the excuses that are offered for killing him. Since DEFRA’s recent survey found that 95 per cent of Britons oppose a badger cull, surely this is both the most humane and democratic solution. In addition, our plan is more scientifically sound than a plan to kill a species that is native to region and belongs there, while the cattle don’t.

Since 1975, more than 30,000 badgers have been culled in a futile attempt to stop bovine TB disease, yet it has still been increasing steadily since 1986. After killing all the badgers in four counties in Ireland, rates of bovine TB are still twice as high there as they are in Britain. Basically, science shows that slaughtering badgers doesn’t control tuberculosis but actually causes it to spread in a “ripple effect” – infected badgers disperse and carry the infection to a larger range.”

Image: Daily Mail / Creative Commons


Tags: , , ,


8 users responded in this post

Subscribe to this post comment rss
posted by Mary on April 11th, 2008 at 4:52 am

Badgers have absolutely NOTHING to do with cow diseases. The people that dreamed this “solution” up are diseased and mad as well.

posted by Pascal J. Dzenga on April 11th, 2008 at 8:54 am

This is just one of those things the government does simply to appear as if their dealing with a problem. It doesn’t have any scientific merit behind it, yet the average person know no better. It’s a criminal waste of life, targeting an intelligent and vulnerable indigenous species.

posted by keith on April 11th, 2008 at 9:30 am

Spot On !! ” Pascal ” with your comment., but how are we ever going to convince the idiots who govern us this is wrong. Plus the 2% of farmers in the UK have to much sway with their setaside grants., and all the other money they receive in aid. Stick them in a inner city for a week and see how well They Survive.

posted by Science Kid on April 13th, 2008 at 8:10 am

Hi, I have to do a Science project on this. If anybody has any more information on this please can you post it as a comment

posted by LUCY BLAKE on April 29th, 2008 at 11:19 am

Mark Purdey - the maverick environmental biologist who fought the government with his views on the real causes of BSE-but lost because of the vested interests envolved- has always maintained that the high incidence of TB in certain dairy areas is down to the high ferrous content and acidity of the soil in those areas. the TB bacillus can only exist where there is high iron content and acidity.so alter the soil and the TB disappears. He maintained and had done many tests and experiments to show that if the nature of the soil was changed by growing ph. altering plants and applying lime and phosphate fertilisers .the details of Mark’s Research are on his website.The Government body that made the decission to cull the badgers knows about this research and its validity but the scientists do not want to lose face . they prefer to use badgers as a scapegoat - when they are just another victim. After all if all the badgers are culled and of course the cows will still go down with TB because the TB is still in the soil. It buys them time - its just like Yes Minister - they just have to appear to do something to satisfy the angry farmers. Its balancing the interests . and the badgers are suitable sacrifice. Unfortuneately Mark Purdey had up -set the Agri-chemical companies with his research on mad cow disease and his more later work on the causes of alzeimers - he and his research on neurotoxins meant that none of his research could ever be used where politics and science collide. so badgers will be sdacrificed so that ignorance on certain sensitive subjects can be maintained. Lucy Blake

posted by Ian L Rubery on April 29th, 2008 at 11:58 am

Three refs I found informative.

1. Research Points to Key New tool for identifying Problem Badger Setts harbouring Bovine TB.
http://warmwell.com/bovinetbpcrap06.html

2. Tuberculosis in badgers; a review of the disease and its significance
for other animals
J.Gallagher and R.S. Clifton-Hadley
Truckle Park, Lustleigh, Devon TQ13 9TF. and Central Veterinary Laboratory,
Veterinary Laboratories Agency, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey, KT15 3NB.
http://www.vet-wildlifemanagement.org.uk/pdf/johngallt_b_review9-04.pdf

3. Badger TB vaccine trial launched.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/5105196.stm

posted by mary barber on April 29th, 2008 at 5:43 pm

Why dont we just vaccinate cattle against TB?

posted by Eileen on May 4th, 2008 at 7:08 am

There is a simple solution which is not being used due to hostility from European meat buyers. Cattle should be vaccinated against TB then there would be no problem and badgers could be left to live in peace and cattle would be healthier and would not be slaughtered for no good reason. Also may I comment that often an animal or human who is naturally immune to TB will test positive in TB testing, the tested area flares up as if the creature has TB but they can in fact be immune. In the case of cattle these animals are presently automatically destroyed. Instead they should be isolated and further tested to see if they are indeed immune. If immune animals were allowed to live and breed they would pass on their immunity to their young through their milk, and thus eventually all cattle would be immune. End of problem! Also correct pasturization of milk products should ensure protection from TB being present in milk.

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated and any obnoxious or promotional comments may be removed. If your comment is excessively inappropriate, or if you question why a comment was removed, you may be banned.

 Name (*required)

 E-Mail Address (*private)

 Web Site (*optional)

Meet Alexia Bookmark This Blog
  • Friends
  • Disclaimer
  • The information and views expressed here are those of the author alone, are subject to change and may not represent the views of PETA. They are provided here for educational purposes only and have been gathered from the author's personal research and experiences. They should not be construed as legal advice. Except where third party ownership or copyright is indicated or credited regarding materials contained in this blog, copying, reproducing or redistributing any of the documents, data, content or materials contained in this Weblog for personal, non-commercial use is enthusiastically encouraged.