5

Jun

A Heated Discussion with Burberry at London College of Fashion


When companies that deal in dead animal skins don’t listen to what we have to say, we need to think of new ways to approach them. Executives and bigwigs at Burberry have been shunning our anti-fur message for years, so it was time to get a little up close and personal.

Tuesday night, PETA US VP Bruce Friedrich (who’s in the UK for a short while) confronted Burberry designer Christopher Bailey at a London College of Fashion discussion on menswear. Also at the event – and at the receiving end of Bruce and Christopher’s rather heated discussion – were fashion journalists Colin McDowell and Jeremy Langmead, and more than 200 students. Some members of the audience even blogged about the exchange of words when they got home.

It went a little something like this:

“Event started at 6 p.m. It was “a discussion” about men’s fashion moderated by Colin McDowell of the Sunday Times. After about 30 minutes of talk about trends, I raised my hand:

· Mr. McDowell said, “Oh good, a question! Yes. Oh and you’re prepared, you have notes! Please wait for the microphone so that everyone can hear you”

· Me: Do you mind if I take the discussion in a slightly different direction?

· McDowell: No no, please do!

· Me (reviewing my notes, which is how I know exactly what I said—I had the microphone and spoke very slowly): I have a question for Mr. Bailey about morality in fashion. [Bailey starts to look nervous]. Specifically, fur farming is so cruel to animals that it is illegal in the UK and many other countries, yet you continue to put it into Burberry’s collections. Animals are anally and vaginally electrocuted and skinned alive [gasps], and you seem not to care at all. Is there any abuse of animals so hideous that you would object?

· Bailey: I would be happy to have that discussion with you, but not here.

· McDowell (blustering, livid, bursts out): Now I have a question for you—What gives you the right to come in here, what relevance does that question have to the issue of men’s fashion. Take his microphone away!

· Me: Well you asked me a question, so please do me the courtesy of hearing my answer. [he looked like “oh shit, well that was stupid of me”] What Christopher Bailey pays people do to do to animals on some of the worst fur farms you can imagine, would put him in jail for cruelty to animals if he were paying people to do it to dogs or cats. The fur industry is a violent bloody industry that skins animals alive and crams them into crates where they go insane, and he supports it. Every time and everyplace is appropriate for this discussion.

· McDowell: Well he says he’ll talk w/you about it later. This is not the time.

· Me: He told us that before and then he didn’t return our calls or reply to our letters.

· McDowell: You have made your point. You’ve done what you came here to do. You are welcome to stay or go, but we will not be discussion this issue at this forum. [thunderous applause, though til this point, you could hear a pin drop].

· About 10 minutes later I walked up and slipped Bailey one of our Burberry leaflets and a note that read, “Please make good on your promise this time. You told us you’d meet with us before; this time please call” and gave him my contact info. McDowell looked very concerned as I walked up.

· When they finished up, I was able to go up and have a very heated exchange with him, our faces about 5 inches apart, in front of the line of people who had come for his autograph.

· Me: I hope you will meet with us; I think if you saw these fur farms, if you really understood the horrible abuse of animals involved in the fur industry, you’d agree to stop designing with this cruel material.

· Bailey (moving in and putting his face about 5 inches from mine - very angry and intense): What gives you the right to come in here and hijack this event and take over everything and disrupt it and ruin this event? This is not the place for this discussion.

· Me: You told us you’d meet with us and then you backed out. I hope you will call or email me to set up a meeting; you are supporting horrible cruelty.

· Bailey: I have to talk with other people. You have no style [yes, he actually said “you have no style”; maybe he meant “class”?]

It was pretty bizarre - everyone on line for an autograph from Bailey took a Burberry leaflet from me (including Bailey and his handler and Jeremy Langmead, the editor of Esquire, who was sharing the stage with him).”

Image: Telegraph / CC


Tags: , ,


14 users responded in this post

Subscribe to this post comment rss
posted by Nicki Hill on June 5th, 2008 at 10:51 am

This is the reponse I had from Burberry after my e-mail asking them to stop selling fur…very interesting … they refer to fur as “natural hides” …

Dear Madam

Thank you for your feedback regarding Burberry’s use of natural hides.

By way of background Burberry is an international luxury brand producing apparel and accessories with a distinct British sensibility for over 150 years. During this time and as a company with a strong outerwear heritage, there has been and will continue to be limited occasions where the use of natural hides will be considered important to meet consumer tastes and demand.

Burberry believes that any materials sourced from animals should be produced without inflicting cruelty or threatening the environment. We will not use natural hides if there is any concern that they have been produced by the unacceptable treatment of the animals. For this reason we do not source such materials from China.

We source natural hides very carefully safeguarding the correct ethical standards and traceability. We principally source fur from SAGA furs in Finland who are well known for upholding high standards of ethical treatment of animals and share our concerns about animal welfare. Consistent with this approach the farms which supply fur are open to third-party inspections at any time.

We do understand your concern on this understandably emotive subject particularly given the inaccurate statements and images that are used in connection with Burberry’s use of natural hides. So thank you for taking the time to contact us on this subject and giving us the opportunity to reply

Customer Services
Burberry Ltd
157-167 Regent St, London
W1B 4PH

Tel: +44 (0) 7000 785676
Fax:+44 (0) 7000 785677

posted by Niranjan on June 5th, 2008 at 12:28 pm

Even i got the same reply! How ignorant they are! & has anyone been to SAGA furs’ website? All lies! Fur is filled with so much of cruelty, u can never hide it!

posted by EL on June 5th, 2008 at 11:33 pm

great job Peta US VP Bruce .. straight up close and up front.. really it’s the only way to get the msg to these people.. for ALL the animals sakes.. hope he’ll relent and start talking to Peta soon! cruelty does not pay! he should konw that!

posted by Matt on June 6th, 2008 at 11:59 am

That standard response is utter tripe:

“there has been and will continue to be limited occasions where the use of natural hides will be considered important to meet consumer tastes and demand.”

They’re creating the demand by making fur lined, fur trimmed and fur items!

What we need is the truth for once, not corporate bull**** - SAGA furs is just as bad as any other furriers, I bet they keep the animals in just as cramped conditions and treat them just as badly.

posted by Matt on June 6th, 2008 at 11:59 am

Christopher Bailey 0 - 1 PETA

posted by Vivian Rees on June 27th, 2008 at 10:27 pm

Hi,

Last year, Burberry decided to close their factory in Treorchy in the Rhondda, South Wales.They sacked their workers, leaving many with no alternative employment because of where the village is situated. I’m sure that if PETA were to research the background and history of Burberry in the Rhondda Valley, there would be many of their ex-workers who would be prepared to give evidence against the company. The closure left a very nasty taste in many of the workers mouths after they had been loyal to the company for many, many years.

posted by Patricia Visciglio on June 28th, 2008 at 4:27 am

Por favor dejen de torturar a tantos animales para vestir a otros (humanos).Ya nadie quiere usar prendas con pieles naturales de esos bellos animales.No mas moda con pieles naturales .
Stop no mas matanzas.Ademas los encierran sin agua sin comida y sus pobres patas se apoyan sobre jaulas que son de TERROR.
lAS MARCAS FAMOSAS YA SON MAL VISTAS Y REPUDIADAS EN TODO EL MUNDO,BURBERRY ,DOLCE ,GUCCI,ARMANI Y MIL MAS…………….. LOS ANIMALES PRIMERO Y BASTA DE MATANZAS ES UN HOLOCAUSTO ANIMAL.DIOS VE TODO.DESDE ARGENTINA .28/6/2008

posted by Guy Montrose on June 28th, 2008 at 7:34 am

I will not be purchasing any Burberry products and would urge others to do likewise.

posted by J & S G Martin-Nichols on June 28th, 2008 at 6:48 pm

Hello,
Good for PETA. We cannot believe that any fur farm is humane; Saga or any one else.

We didn`t get even the standard reply from Burberry!

WE will most definitelt not be buying any Burberry product, and will continue to support PETA in all campaigns.

posted by John Williams on June 28th, 2008 at 8:58 pm

I can’t stand the way Burberry treat public revulsion of it’s cruel attitudes to animals with complete and utter contempt. For God’s sake everyone wake up and stop buying Burberry clothing and help bring the company to its knees.

posted by Angela Brooke-Ward on July 7th, 2008 at 4:43 pm

Consumers hold the untimate key by not buying, make sure YOU are one of those consumers who help to put Burberry out of business as soon as possible.

Angela

posted by individual on July 13th, 2008 at 12:43 pm

I was actually there on the day of the discussion at LCF. I can’t believe you left out the part where the audience repeatedly booed and shouted while you were talking. It was more like ‘what is that guy doing here now’ & ‘get him out of here’, very much annoyed.

Now don’t get me wrong, I am also actually against animal cruelty. But what happened on that day was not like what you wrote and that’s what disgusts me, the act of those who do not have respect for others.

Like Colin McDowell said, you ought to think about if you have any morality in you before coming in to argue with such issue and interrupt the discussion for many students who were there for a different reason.

posted by Tsunami Setsuko on July 30th, 2008 at 6:42 am

Who the hell even wears fur now and days! It one of the most retarded so-called fashion styles out there. Note to the retards who wear fur: It only looks good on the animal it belongs to, yah frickin stupid wannabees. I’m in GA right now facing a problem here as well with something called a ‘fox pen’. It’s where they trap wild foxes and coyotes and put them in large pens with groups of vicious trained hunting dogs so the dogs can get ‘practice’. It makes me furious, but I’ve been unable to make any progress on shutting these horrible places down.

posted by Diana on August 16th, 2008 at 11:07 pm

Yes, I got that same reply. Ethical fur? That’s an oxymoron if I ever heard one.

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated and any obnoxious or promotional comments may be removed. If your comment is excessively inappropriate, or if you question why a comment was removed, you may be banned.

 Name (*required)

 E-Mail Address (*private)

 Web Site (*optional)

Meet Alexia Bookmark This Blog
  • Friends
  • Disclaimer
  • The information and views expressed here are those of the author alone, are subject to change and may not represent the views of PETA. They are provided here for educational purposes only and have been gathered from the author's personal research and experiences. They should not be construed as legal advice. Except where third party ownership or copyright is indicated or credited regarding materials contained in this blog, copying, reproducing or redistributing any of the documents, data, content or materials contained in this Weblog for personal, non-commercial use is enthusiastically encouraged.